Source of truth is missing
Three systems all claiming to hold "a customer record". Which one leads? The answer differs per discipline.
Four decisions per integration: source of truth, sync direction, implementation technique (native, marketplace, middleware or custom) and who maintains it. We design the architecture and map the data flows before a single API call is written. Otherwise you end up with integrations that work until someone renames a field.
One integration is a Zapier, the next is a native app, the third is a custom script built by a former employee whose login credentials are stored nowhere. Nobody knows which system leads on "Customer", data loops in circles and downtime only gets noticed when sales sees no new leads for a week. An integration strategy takes a careful look at this once and for all.
Three systems all claiming to hold "a customer record". Which one leads? The answer differs per discipline.
Native connectors, Zapier, custom scripts and manual exports all mixed together. No consistent strategy, high maintenance, fragile.
Two-way sync sounds appealing, but causes conflicts when there is no priority rule. Changes overwrite each other.
When the integration breaks, nobody knows who is responsible for reconnecting it. This is usually only noticed once data has already been lost.
A four to six week engagement. We inventory, design and deliver a blueprint your IT team or integration partner can execute.
All systems on the table with their role, owner and current integrations. Including shadow IT, Zapier flows and manual CSV exports. A brief intake with IT and the data owners in marketing, sales, service and finance.
Per object (contact, company, deal, product, subscription, order): determine which system leads and who wins that discussion. Often the hardest phase. Marketing, sales, finance and IT need to reach a shared decision. We facilitate; you choose.
Per integration: direction (one-way or two-way), frequency (real-time, periodic, batch), transformation rules and fail-over. Conflict resolution: who wins when both sides change simultaneously. No two-way sync without necessity, as that is the root cause of 80% of integration pain.
Per integration the technique decision: native HubSpot app, marketplace connector, middleware (Workato, HubSpot Operations Hub, Make) or custom API. Per option the TCO over three years, the maintenance risk and who builds and manages it.
Not a list of "connect X to Y". A working document with source-of-truth decisions, sync directions, transformation rules and implementation choices per integration. Including ownership and monitoring.
Integration strategy is technical work with business impact. You work with the CRM architect and the HubSpot specialist, with Carel as strategic lead.
A B2B organisation had seven integrations running: Zapier, a native HubSpot-Salesforce bridge, two custom Python scripts, a Workato flow and two manual exports per week. Nobody knew which one led on customer data.
In five weeks we redesigned the architecture: Workato as the middleware layer, HubSpot as CRM source of truth, ERP as finance source of truth. Seven separate integrations became three middleware flows, with error handling and ownership assigned.
Honest answers to the questions we hear before almost every engagement.
Silos arise not from poor teams but from disconnected systems and inconsistent definitions. We therefore start not with the technology but with a shared source of truth (usually HubSpot), a lifecycle that runs across all three teams and firm agreements on who hands over what and when. Only then comes the technology: integrations, sync direction and ownership per field. The result is a customer view that marketing, sales and service share, rather than three versions of the truth.
We deliver the design and the mapping. The build can be done in Workato, Make, Tray.io or natively. Many clients opt for a RaaS retainer where we also handle the implementation. Otherwise we deliver the blueprint and hand over to an implementation partner.
Yes. We have experience with integrations to Microsoft Dynamics, SAP, Salesforce, NetSuite and a long list of niche tools. The pattern is the same: source of truth, sync direction, technique and ownership.
A tech stack audit looks at which tools you still need and which can go. An integration strategy looks at how the remaining tools communicate with each other. Many clients do them in sequence: clean up first, then connect.
We deliver the blueprint in four to six weeks. The actual build is a separate phase of two to six weeks per integration, depending on complexity and technique choice.
Book a strategy call. We take a brief look at your current systems and pain points, then give you an honest scope.